AYUSH MAHAJAN
AYUSH MAHAJAN / BENGALURUINDEPENDENT · REMOTE

AI PRODUCT + SYSTEMS ENGINEER

I build AI products that have to work outside the demo.

I help founders turn ambitious, incomplete AI ideas into working products—especially when the hard part crosses product decisions, software, and the real world.

See the work →
8+ YEARS BUILDINGHARDWARE → VOICE → AGENTS → VERIFICATION
01 / HOW I GOT HERE

The projects were separate. The responsibility boundary kept returning.

This was not a planned sequence. Looking back, each project forced a different answer to what software could infer, what it could safely do, and what should count as evidence afterward.

01PHYSICAL SYSTEMS2019—24

The signal had to survive the real world.

Cerebralx / Xone put me inside electrodes, noisy EEG, firmware, embedded hardware, and the gap between a compelling demonstration and a dependable loop.

I learned to treat measurement, feedback, and failure as part of the product—not implementation detail.
02CONVERSATIONAL PRODUCTS2024—26

A conversation only matters if the product can use it.

PerPitch and perMail were independent products in different contexts. Both made timing, ambiguity, and the handoff after a conversation impossible to ignore.

I became less interested in a model sounding capable and more interested in the work the conversation could reliably complete.
03GOVERNED ACTION2026—NOW

An agent action needs an owner and an observable result.

Julie and CarbonCompute approached machine action from different directions: enterprise records in one, funded human work in the other.

Both reinforced the same boundary: interpretation can be probabilistic; authority, state, and settlement cannot be vague.
02 / SELECTED WORK

Five products. Five different boundaries between understanding and action.

Each chapter shows one recognizable product moment, what I owned, and the strongest public evidence the record supports.

01 / 05REAL-TIME VOICE PRODUCT
RECENT BUILD · 2026

perMail

A phone agent that knows when the call needs a human.

An AI receptionist that handles missed calls, identifies urgency, and turns the conversation into a clear owner handoff.

Ayush owned

Sole builder across voice, backend, and handoff.

Ownership evidenceFULL PATH · owned by Ayush

Voice loop, backend, handoff, alerts, and reliability debugging.

Customer identities, numbers, recordings, and caller data remain private.
Read the perMail case study →
CONCEPTUAL / PRODUCT BEHAVIORNOT TELEMETRY
01CALLOwner unavailable
02UNDERSTANDReason + urgency
03ROUTERoutine or urgent
ROUTINEContinue the call
HIGH URGENCYBring a person back in
AFTER THE CALLCaller · reason · urgency · next action
02 / 05GOVERNED ENTERPRISE AGENT
BUILD / ACCEPTANCE · 2026

Julie

TECHNICAL FLAGSHIP

Turning messy meeting notes into safe CRM actions.

Meeting notes become reviewable CRM proposals, approved writes, and verified system-of-record state.

Ayush owned

Product and system design across the governed workflow.

Engineering evidenceVERIFIED · combined note + task

Acceptance evidence covers successful ordered execution and duplicate-approval reuse.

Workflow evidence, not customer adoption.
Read the Julie case study →
CONCEPTUAL / PRODUCT BEHAVIORNOT TELEMETRY
MEETING NOTES

“Move the Acme follow-up to Friday and assign it to Maya.”

MODEL PROPOSALTask · date · owner
HUMAN AUTHORITYReview exact change
DETERMINISTIC WRITEExecute approved fields
CRM READBACKCompare stored state
03 / 05VOICE-FIRST FOUNDER EVALUATION
PILOT / REBUILD · 2024—26

PerPitch

A founder should finish the thought before the AI performs intelligence.

A voice-first investor simulation that protects the founder's turn while deeper analysis happens outside the live exchange.

Ayush owned

Founder and product/AI lead.

Commercial evidence180+ · founder-evaluation sessions

Recorded product-use context across PerPitch's founder-evaluation work.

Session evidence, not paid-customer, fundraising, or institutional-adoption evidence.
Read the PerPitch case study →
CONCEPTUAL / PRODUCT BEHAVIORNOT TELEMETRY
LIVE CLOCKFounder finishes the thoughtAI waits → asks one useful probe
ANALYSIS CLOCK
  1. Research
  2. Score
  3. Objections
  4. Feedback
PRODUCT DECISIONKeep slow intelligence outside the live turn
04 / 05AI-TO-HUMAN TASK MARKETPLACE
TESTNET PROTOTYPE · 2026

CarbonCompute

When an agent commissions human work, payment should follow proof—not trust.

A testnet task marketplace where agent-funded work settles only after explicit verification or dispute.

Ayush owned

Product, contracts, verification lifecycle, and frontend.

Engineering evidenceSEPOLIA · deployed test network

The documented LaborEscrow contract is inspectable on Ethereum's Sepolia testnet.

A testnet deployment, not mainnet usage, production funds, or protocol compliance certification.
Read the CarbonCompute case study →
CONCEPTUAL / PRODUCT BEHAVIORNOT TELEMETRY
01FUNDED TASK
02HUMAN WORK
03PROOF
04VERIFY
ACCEPTPay worker
REJECTNo worker payout
DISPUTEPay or refund by ruling
SETTLEMENT RULEFunds move only from an explicit verified state
05 / 05BRAIN–COMPUTER INTERFACE VENTURE
PREVIOUS VENTURE · 2019—24

Cerebralx / Xone

Turning visual attention into a command a connected device can understand.

A lower-cost BCI prototype mapping visual-attention EEG from a fixed target set to predefined device commands.

Ayush owned

Founder and principal engineer.

Commercial evidence~₹50L · non-dilutive support

Government-backed support associated with the Cerebralx venture period.

Funding support for venture development, not product revenue, sales, or clinical adoption.
Read the Cerebralx case study →
CONCEPTUAL / PRODUCT BEHAVIORNOT TELEMETRY
VISUAL TARGET
EEG CAPTURE
FIXED SETClassify target
PREDEFINED DEVICE COMMANDObservable device response closes the loop
Constrained attention classification—not thought-reading or clinical evidence.
03 / HOW I THINK

I use three questions to turn an AI idea into a product boundary.

The model is one layer. The product still has to decide what may happen, who controls it, and how the result becomes visible.

SIGNALINTERPRETATIONPROPOSED ACTIONGOVERNED EXECUTIONREADBACK
01

What is uncertain?

Name what the model may infer, what the product already knows, and what must remain unresolved.

Interpretation boundary
02

Who has authority?

Turn consequential behavior into narrow actions with explicit owners, permissions, and approval points.

Action boundary
03

What proves completion?

Read back durable state, expose partial failure, and leave enough evidence to recover or reconcile.

Verification boundary
04 / WORKING WITH ME

Bring me the unclear, consequential part.

I work directly with founders and product leads when the brief is still moving and the product needs judgment across interface, model behavior, backend state, and delivery.

Expect short feedback loops, working software early, written decisions, and direct conversations about what the evidence does—or does not—support.

01

Frame the risky workflow

We identify the user moment, system boundary, and assumption most likely to invalidate the product before polishing the easy parts.

A decision map and a testable first slice
02

Build the consequential path

I work across product and implementation to make the live call, model handoff, external write, or device loop real enough to judge.

Working software around the hardest path
03

Make the outcome inspectable

We add approval, readback, audit state, and recovery where the product needs to earn trust rather than merely announce success.

A system the team can evaluate and continue
BEST FIT

Product and system audits · focused risky-slice builds · embedded 0→1 delivery

Tell me where the product is stuck →
05 / CURRENT DIRECTION

Following reliability deeper into the system.

I’m extending applied product work into the technical foundations that can justify trust: task-based evaluation, constrained deployment, and stateful agency.

APPLIED DIRECTION

Agent evaluation

Testing whether an agent completed the real task—not whether its explanation sounded convincing.

APPLIED DIRECTION

Local intelligence

Smaller and on-device models where privacy, latency, cost, and hardware are product constraints.

LEARNING DIRECTION

World models

How agents maintain state, understand an environment, and connect reasoning to grounded action.

06 / CONTACTAYUSH MAHAJAN · BENGALURU / REMOTE

Send me the rough version.

Tell me what you are trying to solve, what exists today, and where it breaks. A few honest sentences are enough to begin.

Email me the rough version →